Jazz, Art, Context, and Iconography

How do we go about judging a famous artistic figure? Do we treat them as a stand alone individual, or do we evaluate them in relation to their peers? I’ve often grappled with this subject and, true to my intellectually ambivalent nature, still haven’t parked myself in either camp. I go back and forth, insufferably so. Keeps discussion interesting I guess. I hope!

I remember many years ago, listening to my father (a trumpet player) having a lively discussion with another musician (also a trumpet player) about Chet Baker. The topic was whether Baker’s talent squared with his popularity. My father’s position was a definitive “no”. Let me explain the context. The year was 1954, and my Dad, 22 years old at the time and jazz lover to his core, opened the pages of Downbeat Magazine and saw that Chet Baker was voted Best Trumpet Player of the year in a reader poll. Best Trumpet Player. Of 1954. A glorious year for jazz. A year when the competition included not only greats like Miles Davis and Dizzy Gillespie, but my father’s idol, the gifted young prodigy Clifford Brown. So it was in that context that my father forged a mild but persistent resentment of Chet Baker. I tried several times to get my dad to warm up to Baker but he simply couldn’t no matter how hard he tried. He didn’t dismiss Baker’s talent outright, mind you. He just held trumpet playing in such high regard that his standards were earnest and precise. In other words, if Clifford Brown was on the scene, Baker had to take a back seat. No Clifford, then Baker deserves a shot. (“No Clifford” came soon enough. He was tragically killed in a car crash in 1956. A promising young talent gone at the age of 25).

Chet Baker, photographed by Bob Willoughby:

chetbaker

Like my dear friend Fred Hatt, Baker was a native Oklahoman. Born Chesney Henry Baker Jr. in 1929, “Chet” joined the army after dropping out of college. Upon his discharge he set down his jazz roots in Los Angeles, at a time when a genre split was forming in the jazz community – “cool” West Coast jazz versus East Coast bebop. The geographical labels are less significant than the actual sound, which is where the true distinction is realized. East Coast jazz was intense, frenzied, edgy, and introspective. West Coast jazz was laid-back, uncluttered, very “listener-friendly” and accessible. East Coast jazz embraced dissonance and radical chord changes, while West Coast jazz relied more on smooth arrangements and a light swinging feel. It must be noted also that the East Coast crew was comprised mostly of black musicians like John Coltrane, Bud Powell, and Charles Mingus, while the West Coast crew was primarily white, its main figures being Dave Brubeck , Stan Getz, Gerry Mulligan and, of course, Chet Baker – the classic, chiseled, handsome, corn-fed American white boy if there ever was one.

chet-baker-trumpet-towards-floor-los-angeles-record-session-1953

Books and scholarly articles have been written about the rivalry between Matisse and Picasso, and their work is often assessed in contrast to each other. The same treatment has been done to Michelangelo and da Vinci, Pollock and de Kooning, Lennon and McCartney, Hemingway and Fitzgerald, The Beatles and the Rolling Stones, Marlon Brando and James Dean, etc. The list goes on and on. We like to frame everything as a competition. But is it fair? Well, it’s not necessarily unfair. In spite of their self-absorption and individualism, artists do not exist in a vacuum. They are, for better or worse, part of a group. A club. A particular era in time. If you are an artist and the other guy is doing something new, original, and groundbreaking, you would be smart to pay attention. Creative souls feed off each other, challenge each other, influence each other. That competitive interplay generally raises the quality of everyone involved. So it is inevitable that an artist’s contributions will be evaluated in the context of his peers. Depending on the artist, that can be either a blessing or an albatross.

baker3

The public (especially women) adored Chet Baker, but many jazz critics eviscerated him. He was a “lightweight”, they said. He couldn’t read music. He had no upper register and couldn’t hit a high C. He represented style over substance. He was a poor man’s Miles Davis. Okay, but let’s consider what Chet Baker did bring to the table. He was insanely photogenic. A stylish Beat Generation hipster. It may sound shallow, but that kind of thing scores a lot of points. Never underestimate the resonant power of “image” in popular culture. Also, in addition to the trumpet, Baker played an excellent flugelhorn. Most notably, Baker offered something extra to communicate with and engage his audience. Unlike the moody, mercurial, introverted East Coasters, Chet Baker could chill out and sing. He didn’t just sing. He was a seductive crooner. That reaches out to people in an intimate and sensitive way, and the listening public gobbles it up.

William Claxton’s famous photograph of Chet Baker with his second wife Halima:

claxtonbaker

Most impressive, in my opinion, was the supportive endorsement Chet Baker received from none other than the legendary Charlie Parker :bows down in worship: If Bird saw something in the guy, then that counts for an awful lot. Parker even invited Chet to join him on tour for his West Coast dates.

But still, there’s the race thing. The pesky, unavoidable race thing. There’s no denying that race played a significant role in Baker’s easy rise to popularity. Remember context? Well, this was still racially segregated, pre-Brown vs Board of Education, pre-Civil Rights Act 1950s America. Was it fair that Chet Baker was promoted more aggressively than black musicians? That he could travel freely throughout the country and play in any venue and stay at any hotel? That he could talk to a white cocktail waitress without being hassled? (which happened to Miles Davis). Of course it’s not fair. But conversely, the race card can also be played to belittle Baker’s talent, and that is equally unfair. It carries the suggestion that a pretty-boy white guy can’t play jazz, and that’s just silly. Chet Baker did possess unique interpretive skills, and he brought subtle inflections to his playing that were lyrical, vulnerable, and haunting. And while Baker’s critics have accused him of lacking inventiveness and musical innovation, one could counter that argument by crediting him with popularizing jazz and attracting a broader audience to an art form that was previously regarded as insular and esoteric.

Chet Baker and Charlie Parker together onstage:

chetandbird

So what’s my opinion of Chet Baker? I know you’re all on the edge of your seats in eager anticipation! 😆 Well, I like him. I just don’t love him. I understand that he was an easy target of ridicule by jazz critics who, much like art critics, can be a snotty, mean-spirited bunch. I also understand that Baker clearly benefitted from advantages that were non-musical in nature; matinee idol good looks, youth, and race. But I can’t fault the guy for circumstances that were out of his control. My main issue with him as a musician is based solely on my personal taste. It’s a lack of fearlessness. I like fearlessness in creative people. Baker’s trumpet playing, to me, often feels timid and restrained. He plays with no authority. His horn sounds fragile, like it’s about to break at any second. I do enjoy listening to Chet Baker, but at times it can be exasperating. In my mind I start thinking, “Play! Play man! Blow! BLOW INTO THE HORN, DAMMIT!”. Grrrr. But that’s just me 😉

If Chet Baker didn’t deserve jazz “street cred” through his music in the eyes of some, he certainly earned it when it came to his personal habits. In the tragic, cliched tradition of jazz musicians, Baker was hooked on drugs throughout his adult life. Although he tried many times to kick his heroin addiction, the stays in rehab and methadone clinics didn’t stick. He was in and out of jail many times in both Europe and the United States. The low point came in San Francisco in 1966, when Baker was beaten up during an alleged drug buy. All his teeth were knocked out and he had to wear dentures from then on. He also had to learn to play the trumpet all over again.

In his later years, Baker’s physical appearance changed dramatically. With the drug use and wild living having taken their visible toll, the transformation was astonishing. The once handsome, fresh-faced young trumpeter now looked gaunt, ghostly, beaten. A broken shell of a man.

chetbaker1

His demise, predictably, was grisly. In 1988, Chet Baker’s dead body was discovered at 3 AM on the street just below his hotel room window in Amsterdam. He was only 58 years old. Although the death was ruled an accident, speculation has raised questions as to whether it was a suicide, or even a murder. Does it even matter?

Some creative artists rise to incredible historic heights. Picasso, Shakespeare, Beethoven, etc. Their artistic contributions are permanently seared into the annals of art and held up as awe-inspiring exemplars of brilliant creative output. Trailblazers. Prodigies. Mad geniuses. But let’s face it. That is a very, very select and exclusive group. Chet Baker was not, and could not be, Dizzy Gillespie. And we can safely assume that Chet himself knew this. Maybe Chet Baker just didn’t have the soul of an innovator. That kind of thing has been said about Degas you know. Everyone agrees that he was great, but critics remind us that he didn’t “change” anything, didn’t assert enough influence. Oh man, who cares? Who sets these rules anyway? Maybe Chet Baker was both conscious of his limitations and aware of his strengths. If so, there is absolutely nothing wrong or inauthentic about that. If anything, it is profoundly authentic. It means that the man knew who he was as an artist. And if that’s the case, I say we just enjoy the music. Enjoy the art. Enjoy the expression . . . from wherever and whomever it comes . . .

“I’m Through With Love”, performed by Chet Baker:

19 thoughts on “Jazz, Art, Context, and Iconography

  1. Elaine says:

    Claudia, you have exceeded your past blog posts with this one. I read it with such interest, and especially with Daddy in mind. The fifties were our time and it brought back so many memories. I loved the way you juxtaposed the East and West musicians and their unique talents. Your father left you with this wonderful legacy to appreciate musicians and how they gave us such joy. Dad would be so proud.

  2. Very nice piece, Claudia. There’s a lot of Chet over on youtube, his Time After Time (Belgium 1964) is nice and mellow. But yes, just like you I said: ““Play! Play man! Blow! BLOW INTO THE HORN, DAMMIT!”. -grin-

    Yes, of course race/persona/history comes in to play, which, in my opinion, isn’t necessarily good or bad, it just is. I had a friend, back in the fifties that played blow em away and leave their mouths open gasping flamenco guitar, – but somehow a flamenco man named Mike Sullivan just isn’t taken seriously. Oh well…

    Your piece got me reminiscing about the Five Spot, in the village, in the late fifties, early sixties where late at night it seemed everyone from up town and around town would come down to just jam after finishing paying gigs.

    Good, piece, Claudia, good times, good memories.

    Thanks;
    Jim

    • artmodel says:

      Jim,

      “a flamenco man named Mike Sullivan”. I love that! 😆

      Yes, there’s a lot of Chet on YouTube. I wish there was more live footage, though, instead of musical tracks set to still photos.

      I really enjoyed your comments, and thanks for sharing your memories of New York in the 50s.

      Claudia

  3. Jennifer says:

    I don’t know anything about jazz, but found this a really interesting blog – gorgeous photos too!

  4. fredh1 says:

    The 1988 film of Chet Baker by Bruce Weber, “Let’s Get Lost” is worth seeing, and you can find some clips from it on YouTube, ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5H2bzk2zcc ) but unfortunately I don’t think it’s out on DVD. Chet Baker is not a trailblazing genius like Miles Davis, but he shines anyway, partly because his look is so iconic – it’s not just his cheekbones, it’s the way he inhabits his body and the way he inhabits his era. Every photo you included here is striking, and there are many more of this guy, embodying the most romantic aspect of the beat generation. Maybe he wasn’t one of the great musicians of all time, but he was definitely one of the great models of all time, which makes him eminently appropriate for a feature spot on Museworthy!

    • artmodel says:

      Fred,

      I know about that Bruce Weber film and I’ve been wanting to see it. I think I heard that it is coming out on DVD. I hope so. That would be great. Thanks for the YouTube link.

      Choosing photos was easy for this post because there are many of both “versions” of Chet – the young , handsome and healthy one, and the tragic, drug-ravaged one. He is compelling and charismatic in both forms. But I love your take on it, that he was a genuinely great “model”. Very Museworthy! The camera loves cheekbones like those.

      Thanks for your comments, Fred!

      Claudia

  5. Brian says:

    If I were grading this as a term paper, I’d give it an A++

    Truely awesome job, Claudia.

    • artmodel says:

      Brian,

      I wish I had professors like you in college. I would have graduated at the top of my class! Actually, I made it to cum laude but higher would have been awesome.

      Thanks so much sweetie for your generous words. I did slave over this post, so I guess it was worth it. I really wanted to get it right for my readers.

      Great to hear from you!

      Claudia 🙂

  6. babahr says:

    I actually prefer the older Chet to the younger one. The melancholy in his voice means something new to me in the last recordings. In the young Chet, it was ennui. What did that gorgeous talented boy have to complain about? In the old Chet, the melancholy almost seemed amused, like he had been through much much worse than the lyrics depicted. Melancholy was a mild emotion compared to what he’d seen. As a result, the blue, especially on the soundtrack of the film Fred mentioned, seems even more easy and breezy than that of his cool era.

    ‘I Remember Clifford’ is a great song and tribute to Brown. Here’s a link:

  7. babahr says:

    whoops! sorry Claudia—I didn’t know it would put a big image in your comments section. i don’t wanna hijack your comments section!

    • artmodel says:

      Bob,

      Oh no, it’s fine! You can “hijack” my comments section anytime 🙂 Especially for “I Remember Clifford”. I hadn’t listened to it in quite a while, and I am so grateful that you posted it here. I started crying. I still am! You see, we played a full hour of Clifford Brown at my father’s funeral. That was my brother’s excellent idea. And this recording by Bud Powell is just so expressive and sensitive. A tender tribute.

      Bob, thank you for the video, from the bottom of my heart 🙂

      I also loved your thoughts on Chet Baker. I agree with you completely. His later work is superior, as it carries a pathos and irony you don’t find in is earlier stuff. He definitely matured as an artist, and his drug addiction didn’t diminish his playing as it does in some musicians.

      Wonderful thoughtful comments, Bob. Thank you again, especially for “I Remember Clifford”. It really touched me . . .

      Claudia

  8. Ed says:

    Nice post, Claudia.

  9. Yifan says:

    Wonderfully interesting read. thanks!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s