Jazz on YouTube

When I heard that YouTube is celebrating its 5th birthday, I was a little surprised. It feels like the video-sharing website has been around much longer than that, doesn’t it? I guess its immense popularity warps our sense of time. Anyway, I thought “Music Monday” is an appropriate opportunity to slice up a big Happy Birthday cake for good old YouTube, since music viewing/listening is one of the site’s more noteworthy strengths. Sure, there’s a lot of really stupid shit on YouTube, but among all the clips of people falling down, wayward lawnmowers, cats in bathtubs, and college pranks, some fantastic videos can be found in the music category, specifically jazz. I think I speak for my fellow jazz fans when I say that we love YouTube for providing rarely-seen footage of jazz greats. They’re often grainy and in black in and white, but well worth watching for the brilliance of these legends.

I am partial to trumpet players, because of my father naturally. If he were alive today he would go crazy over this video of a young Freddie Hubbard jamming with Art Blakey and the Jazz Messengers. From 1962, Freddie is just 24 years old – a fresh, gifted new trumpeter with tremendous promise. I have yet to meet a trumpet player who does not speak admiringly of his talent. Unfortunately, Freddie’s career was later compromised by health issues and a drug addiction, and the quality of his playing suffered because of it. He also blew his lip out, which is obviously a serious problem for a trumpet player. So that’s why this video is especially worthwhile because it showcases the true musician he was. Also in the group is the amazing Wayne Shorter on sax. By the way, the video uploader is “eatsleeptrumpet”. Fantastic! :-) What did I tell you about trumpet players and Freddie Hubbard love? It’s intense.

Performing Moanin‘ this is Freddie Hubbard with the Jazz Messengers. They groove into a nice swing at :30, and then Freddie just rips at :55. Truly electric.

Honeysuckle on the Hudson

So what is everybody doing on this holiday weekend? Enjoying family, friends, and Mother Earth perhaps? That’s what I’ve been doing so far, all within the boundaries of good ol’ NYC. We’ve got everything here, folks, and “everything” even includes a medieval garden of the highest horticultural standards.

My family and I spent Saturday afternoon at The Cloisters, the uptown branch of the Metropolitan Museum that houses the museum’s impressive medieval art collection. Located in Fort Tryon Park, the Cloisters overlooks the Hudson River. This was the second time in less than a year we’ve all gone up there. I posted last summer about a Cloisters family day. Here’s a picture of one of the many stunning views from the Cloisters’ balcony. I took it earlier in the day when the skies were still overcast. That’s the George Washington Bridge, and that land is New Joy-zee . . . ahem . . . I mean New Jersey ;-)

This weekend the Cloisters is holding events and  fun activities for the children, and my niece Olivia enjoyed exploring the castle atmosphere and, most of all, the gardens. Here she is smelling a pretty pink carnation:

The Cloisters gardens are carefully designed and landscaped to replicate an authentic medieval garden, right down to every botanical selection. So you have plants that were prized for their medicinal uses, fragrance, cooking and  magical symbolism.

Check out that beautiful climbing yellow honeysuckle on the right:

\

Gorgeous pink roses:

Sunny beds around the border, quince trees providing shade in the center:

Getting a lift to explore the fountain:

Everyone stopped to enjoy these still-young citrus trees. How can you resist them? They are charming and colorful and so cute!

Herbs are abundant in the Cloisters gardens. For centuries, those plants have been valued  for their therapeutic, healing properties. This is Valerian:

Comfrey:

Chives:

Stroll, kneel, and sniff. That’s how you explore an aromatic garden with delicate plants. There’s that honeysuckle again:

I just had to take a picture of these branches of the quince tree:

Something called a Hart’s Tongue Fern. I don’t know anything about it, but I want one for my garden! Great for shady spots, and nice shiny green leaves:

Peering in from behind the ivy:

A nice spot for quiet reflection:

Enjoy the rest of the weekend my dear friends! Love, peace, and happiness to you all. See you soon :-)

Crimes and Misdemeanors

I have never understood the whole art heist thing. Is anybody else with me on this? Maybe someone can explain it to me because I just don’t get it. What is the point of stealing famous, priceless works of art that are recognized the world over? Well, I know the point which is to have famous, priceless works of art in your possession. I mean after that . . . what are you supposed to do with your big score? You can’t exactly hang them on your wall and then invite your friends over for  an art viewing social gathering, replete with an open bar and canapes, and proudly show off your newly-acquired art. That would raise a little suspicion, don’t you think?  People will ask, “Arnie works at the post office, how did he get a Picasso?”. You can’t sell them to any reputable art dealer, gallery, or museum curator. That’s out. So I repeat, what’s the point? We’re not talking about a stolen Rolex or a set of hubcaps. These are recognizable, renowned, famous paintings by major artists! An “all points bulletin” has been issued, Interpol is looking for your ass! You can’t show them to anybody, you can’t sell them, WTF???

Most of you probably heard about the big art heist in Paris last week. Great modern masterpieces, estimated to be worth $120 million, were swiped from the Modern Art Museum. These burglars somehow managed to cut a padlock, climb through a window, carry out several big paintings, and did it all without triggering the alarm because the system was temporarily disabled and the Museum was still waiting for the replacement part! Can you believe this? You can’t make this stuff up. Now I’m certainly no expert on heists of any kind, but I’m guessing this was an inside job because someone among the gang of theives obviously knew about the faulty alarm. Or were tipped off by someone.

This is one of the stolen paintings. Modigliani’s Woman With a Fan:

When I was a kid, I once stole two pretzels from the corner candy store. Remember those big glass jars with the long pennystick pretzels? They were literally a penny a piece. Well for some reason, I took two out of the jar when the storekeeper wasn’t looking and just walked out with them without paying. Don’t ask me why I did it because I have no idea! I was such a good, obedient, well-behaved kid, so this incident was really out of character for me. But something just came over me at that moment and I turned into a little thief. Do you know that I was racked with guilt that night? I’m not joking. I was in my bedroom, almost crying, completely tormented and ashamed over stealing those pretzels, and I was terrified that some candy store SWAT team was going to bust down my door and arrest me for my crime. I admit that I am prone to having a guilty-conscience when I do bad things, but this was a bit much! :lol:

But at least I got to EAT my pennysticks. I think that’s my point. These burglars don’t care about the beauty of art or the genius of Picasso’s Cubist period or Matisse’s use of color. They are working on an entirely different level – one driven by avarice, corruption, and all sorts of sleazy black market underworld doings. The article I linked to above discusses this, and talks about drug trafficking and organized crime. It helped me understand the whole art heist thing, somewhat. But I still don’t get it. It’s all too creepy for me.

Another one of the recently stolen works, the gorgeous Pastoral by Henri Matisse:

Beethoven’s Tenth

Don’t worry everyone. This post title is not the embarrassing major blunder it appears to be. I assure you that I, your trusted blogger, am fully aware that there is no such thing as “Beethoven’s Tenth”. The great composer famously wrote just nine symphonies, one of the most widely-known numerical stats in the annals of classical music. So what’s with all this “Beethoven’s Tenth” nonsense? Well, since this is “Music Monday”, allow me to explain.

Many creative figures in art, music, etc, had to live in the shadow of a master. A predecessor or peer of such enormous magnitude, such untouchable genius, that they set the bar so high it is virtually out of reach for mere mortals. Now some used that position as a motivating force for achievement and a reason to work even harder. Others saw it as a demoralizing source of frustration, discouragement, and jealousy, feeling forever dwarfed and hopelessly relegated to second-rate status. Imagine for a moment having to be the 19th century composer Johannes Brahms creating music under the looming shadow of  the invincible Ludwig von Beethoven. Even worse, imagine being hailed as the “next Beethoven”. Ugh. That’s an impossible burden to carry. Brahms of course idolized Beethoven immensely, yet still he said, “You can’t have any idea what it’s like always to hear such a giant marching behind you.”

Beethoven was already dead for six years when Brahms was born in Hamburg in 1833. A fine pianist in his youth, Brahms developed into an outstanding composer. He was a perfectionist – diligent, careful, and tentative in his approach to composing, and so self-critical that he was known to frequently destroy his own work that he deemed unsatisfactory. Brahms’ personality was been recorded as rather gruff but friendly, outspoken, and often sarcastic. And beer – he liked his beer.

Photo of a young Johannes Brahms – handsome, blond-haired, blue-eyed, with rather delicate features:

Brahms was not, however, an open book with regard to his deepest feelings and hesitated to reveal his vulnerabilities (except maybe to Clara Schumann, wife of his good friend and fellow composer Robert Schumann, but that’s another blog post). Brahms the man seems to have lived with a protective shell around his emotional self, and some – namely his detractors- would accuse his music of sharing a similar quality. As a fanatical, almost obsessive, admirer of Beethoven, I confess that I have been one of those detractors. But I am terribly biased in that regard and can’t even have a rational discussion comparing Beethoven to anybody. But Brahms’ reserve is his trademark. Brahms is like the child with a coloring book who stays within the lines, and keeps his crayons sharpened and never gets marks on his fingers. In Brahms’ own words, he placed the highest priority on form and structure and expressed considerable disdain for emotional excesses. Brahms despised his contemporary Wagner for that very sin.

For years, Brahms enjoyed a successful career composing piano works, string quartets, chamber music and so on. Many truly fine pieces of music that were well-received by the listening public. But he composed no stage works (opera or ballet), and most significantly, no symphony. People started to wonder, and even Brahms’ friends confronted him about his lack of a major symphonic piece. Brahms said he was working on it, and he was – for fourteen years! But hey, can you blame the guy for taking so long? The pressure for the next great German symphony was intense, as there had been nothing noteworthy since Beethoven’s Ninth in 1824. That was a tough act to follow. Beethoven’s stirring, memorable, monumental Ninth cast a long, loooong shadow.

A Google Image search for Brahms produces many photos of him in his aged years when he was fat, bearded, and looked like a curmudgeon. I selectively chose his young hottie pics. Hope you guys don’t mind. I know the ladies don’t ;-)

Finally, after a lengthy gestation period, Johannes Brahms’ long-awaited Symphony No. 1 in C minor, debuted in 1876. And the reviews were great! So great, in fact, that the critics dubbed it . . . “Beethoven’s Tenth”! Ooooh, man. That’s meant to be a compliment but it’s also a little . . . fucked. Right? Brahms didn’t exactly embrace it. Unsure how to digest the label, he thought he was being accused of unoriginality, even plagiarism. When someone mentioned to him that his First Symphony contained clear influences of Beethoven’s Ninth, Brahms replied, “Das kannt jeder Esel!”, which translates into something like “Any ass can see that!”. In other words, “No shit, Sherlock!”. In other words, “Duh!”. In other words, “What the fuck does everybody want from me? They’ve anointed me the heir to Beethoven my whole adult life and now they call my First Symphony ‘Beethoven’s Tenth”? Is that a joke or an insult or a compliment or what??” Ok I made up those last few, but you get the idea :lol:

In writing this post, I decided to refrain from turning it into a Beethoven vs Brahms smackdown. I will devote many Music Monday posts in the future to Beethoven. All I will say is that I am not one of those meanie Brahms haters who dismiss his music as “boring” and have equated listening to Brahms with “watching paint dry”. That’s pretty cold, and not fair. George Bernard Shaw wrote scathing insults of Brahms’ music. Personally I don’t care for his orchestration, and it also bothers me that he never seems to open a vein and allow his blood and guts and soul to gush forth the way Beethoven does. However, my brother Chris educated me on Brahms’ significant strengths and shared some of his personal favorites. I’m glad he did, because I discovered that Brahms has some truly extraordinary musical moments that are downright brilliant.

You can play an audio recording of Brahms’ First Symphony at this link. It appears second on the list . . . right underneath Beethoven ;-)

Recovery and Shared Revelations

:slides down banister . . . jumps off staircase . . . snaps fingers . . . shakes booty . . . crushes thermometer underfoot . . . kisses the flu goodbye: Yahooo!!! It’s good to be back :-)

I hardly got on the computer these past few days, and now I can catch up not only with Museworthy but with friends’ blogs too. Fellow figure model Brooke Lynne has a post up right now that I found very moving. I apologize if this sounds hokey, but it really spoke to me. Brooke is not only a superb model but an outstanding blogger as well. With her current post she is expressing some profoundly enlightened, deeply-felt revelations about life, happiness, and inner peace.  And I hear every word of it. I totally relate to what she’s experiencing and totally understand her need to blog about it – the feeling of awakening, the self-awareness, and the essential, fundamental, simple everyday joy that must be treasured and nourished at all costs. Ah, Brooke says it much better than me.

I could, and will, write much more about this sublime and complex subject, as I’m sure Brooke will too. Maybe it’s a nude model thing! ;-) We tend to do a lot of pondering. A lot. Thanks Brooke for your courageous, intelligent, and sensitive words. Yours was the first blog I checked on in my post-flu return. Here’s a painting for us. It’s William Bouguereau’s La Danse. Peace friend . . .

Stormy (Under the) Weather

Hi everyone. I’m sorry to report that I’m sick with the flu :cry:  My nemesis. This is like an annual ritual with me. Luckily, this bout is not quite as bad as previous ones. My fever was up to 101.9 but it’s already down to 99.6. My body is riddled with aches and pains, which is the worst thing to deal with. Everything hurts. Even my eyelids hurt when I blink. I didn’t know it was possible for eyelids to hurt. I have no appetite, and all I do is sleep. Plus, I’m gross. Haven’t showered or brushed my hair, and I’m sweating into all my t-shirts.

But it’s still “Music Monday”! And as weak as I am I can still embed a video. We lost the great Lena Horne last week. Singer, actress, dancer, civl rights activist. Not to mention a stunningly beautiful woman. Stormy Weather is close enough to “Under the Weather” which would be my song :sob: You definitely don’t want to hear me singing right now – nothing but moans, and groans, and wails. Not pleasant. Let’s listen to Lena instead. RIP.

PS- To everyone who emailed me over the weekend, thank you! I read them all and will write back as soon as I’m feeling better :-)

Writing About Models

Art modeling is a unique profession. That’s one of  the many characteristics I love about it. Our work is highly specialized, unconventional, and organic. It is vastly unlike most everyday jobs and vocations, which makes it all the more awesome :-) Perhaps because of its unusual qualities, art modeling is all too often misunderstood or underappreciated. So the more voices that can speak on our behalf and provide enlightenment of our commitment and hard work, the better.

Regular Museworthy reader and frequent commenter Andrew Cahner is an artist’s model who has written a truly excellent volume called The Art Model’s Handbook. I am proud over mere existence of this book, and Andrew’s intelligent, comprehensive account of professional art modeling and all that it entails. While it is mainly a detailed, practical guide that illuminates the complexities and responsibilites of modeling work, the book is also, in spirit, a reverent tribute to the figurative art world and the creative relationships that drive it. What’s most impressive about The Art Model’s Handbook is its thoroughness. He omitted nothing. There is not a single question that Andrew doesn’t answer, not a single issue he doesn’t address. He literally covers everything, and covers it well, from the practical concerns of working in a studio, preparation, pay rates, etiquette, safety, and bookings, to the deeper artistic elements of poses, gestures, nudity, and the great timeless tradition of art modeling. Full of interviews, references, a glossary of terms, and personal insights, Andrew’s book is wonderfully readable, lucidly written, and a one-of-a-kind resource for art models both new and experienced, as well as artists, teachers, and students. With its very publication, The Art Model’s Handbook has solidified the legitimacy, virtue, and immeasurable value of serious, professional art modeling.

From page 47 of The Art Model’s Handbook, Andrew writes:

Throughout the years I have ben modeling, I have always been curious about what makes artists tick. Where do they find inspiration? What is their process? The most fulfilling modeling experiences for me have been when it feels like a collaboration – a joint creative effort. The more in tune I am with how artists think, the better I can support them as a model.

That is the voice of a dedicated, conscientious model, one who understands and appreciates that our distinct role in the world is all about art, inspiration, and the creation of beauty. Well done, Andrew! I am truly honored to be your colleague :-)

It’s less common, but equally refreshing, when artists step up to the plate and write about their professional relationship with models. My friend Daniel Maidman has written an article in the May issue of International Artist magazine titled “The Artist’s Model”. In it he discusses practical aspects of a private model session from an artist’s point of view, covering such topics as studio preparation, proper behavior and protocol, and the model’s comfort. It is evident from his gracious and attentive tone that Daniel has enormous respect and admiration for models and, as a figurative artist, is clearly aware of our essential role in the creation of art. There are, unfortunately, some artists who take models for granted and treat us with insufficient respect and consideration. I’ve known a few in my day. Hopefully Daniel’s article will help awaken them to a more appreciative understanding of what we do. Thank you Daniel!

Pseudo-Spanish from Manet

Greetings everyone! This is “Music Monday” for May 10th :-)

No sane person would ever describe Edouard Manet as a “bohemian”. He was far from it. Unlike his penniless, struggling, rebellious and free-thinking peers, Manet was bourgeois through and through. Refined, educated, well-mannered, walking, breathing proof of his upper middle class Parisian pedigree. Not that there’s anything inherently wrong with that. The guy just didn’t have any “street cred” as they say.

Let me just state that I have always been lukewarm about Manet. Not on issues regarding his skill and technique as an artist, mind you. I am no one to criticize such things! The man was a great painter. We know this. But I feel that his bourgeois mentality infused his art in such a way that much of it often appears exceedingly staged, overly orchestrated to a point where the fakery is almost comical.

Let’s take a look at one of Manet’s most famous paintings, one I see at the Met all the time. It’s The Spanish Singer from 1860, created when Manet was in his “Spanish themes” phase. Again, we’re not talking about color or brushstrokes or anything like that. Instead, we’ll examine the flagrant bullshittery of this work. First of all, it is a studio piece, meaning that it’s posed and laden with props. Secondly, the model was likely not Spanish, not a singer, and not a guitar player. It’s just some French guy play-acting as a Spanish musician:

That is a right-handed guitar turned around to be left-handed, a detail Manet apparently didn’t think worthy of his attention. Those clothes are not authentic to any particular Spanish region or style. They are just pieces put together to resemble “Spanishness” or something close to it, just enough to fool his clueless Paris Salon audience. And what’s up with those shoes?? They look like Nikes :lol: The model’s facial expression suggests nothing musical at all. He simply has his mouth open, and we’re supposed to interpret that as singing, when really it  just looks like he’s burping. And lastly, those stupid fucking onions in the bottom right corner. Ugh! Again, that has “studio props” written all over it. What was Manet thinking? “Those Spanish people eat a lot of spicy food so let me throw a couple of onions in there to make it more ‘real’.” Maybe he should have thrown in a tamale for good measure.

So while the painting may be technically outstanding, it’s bogus in every other way. Now for any other artist that would be fine. But this is the exalted Manet. We expect great things from him, and with this painting he offers merely an art studio version of a “Spanish singer” – a generic imitation, completely devoid of authenticity, character, passion, or really any warmth on Manet’s part.

For a taste of real Spanish musicality and spirit, here is the great flamenco guitarist Carlos Montoya performing Tanguillo; Zambrilla. I wonder if he had any onions lying around when he recorded this track :lol:


Mommy

When I think of all the crap my brother and I put my Mom through, I realize that designating just one day to commemorate the strength, patience and unconditional love of mothers is, well, kinda lame. Especially for my mom who is a beacon of devotion. Yes, she does it well.

Picasso’s Mother and Child:

Happy Mother’s Day, Mommy :-)

Love,
Claudia

Buried Treasure

In recent posts I’ve been boring you all about the massive spring house cleaning I’m doing. What I didn’t realize was that my computer is also in dire need of a cleanup. Does anyone else fall into that “sloppy computer” phase, or is it just me? Too many files, too many bookmarks, too many downloads, things I forgot to label and classify. I got careless and sloppy with everything from documents, images, music, etc, and now I don’t know what the hell is going on. It’s chaos I tell ya! Time to start dragging stuff into the trash I think.

But the good part about getting organized is that you find things you really want to keep, and can now archive them properly. In my iPhoto for example, I found some pictures I took at the Met that I probably intended to put on the blog or on Flickr and never got around to it. Some of them are worth sharing, so here we go.

Marble sculpture of Sappho by Comte Prosper D’Epinay, who worked in both France and Italy. This piece is from around 1895:

The favorite sculptor of my dear friend Bruce Williams is Aristide Maillol, so this one’s for him. It’s Maillol’s bronze masterpiece Night from 1909. A fascinating work, it is reminiscent of Rodin and his sensuality and naturalism but also of Brancusi and his abstract Modernism. I have done this closed, withdrawn pose many times, as have most artist’s models I’m sure. It’s relatively easy to hold for long lengths of time and looks great in both male and female figures. Artistically, it conveys a contemplative, almost world-weary mood along with a compact shape and voluminous forms:

Look at what else I found in my computer disarray; Orpheus! Man am I an idiot. I could have used this baby for my Orpheus post last week. I knew I had it! Damn. Anyway, this is Italian from the early 17th century:

At the age of 41, I still hold onto the fantasy that I will meet the man of my dreams, my knight in shining armor, at the Met. But actually he’s there every single day! The problem is he’s a little standoffish and never asks for my number :lol:

I always stop by this painting when I go to the museum. Lovely, charming, and very beautiful in person, it’s Roman Girl at a Fountain by Leon Bonnat. I love the feet.

That’s about it for now. I have others but I’m going to keep them on reserve, properly catalogued, for use in future posts. Hope you enjoyed this little treasure hunt with me. Ciao darlings!!

Sing Along With Pete

Greetings! I’m back in weekday mode after a truly fabulous Friday – Sunday. But Mondays aren’t so bad when you have “Music Monday”! :-) Let’s do it.

Even though I had virtually no time to prepare a blog post for today, YouTube came to my rescue with a real gem. I guess since I am still in the activist mindset from the Peace March yesterday – see the pictures on my Flickr – I gravitated toward music with a voice of conscience, a voice of purity and humanity. Who better to fill that role than the iconic folk singer, peace advocate, civil rights champion, and environmental activist Pete Seeger.

In this amazing video, Pete appears as a guest on “The Johnny Cash Show”, which aired on ABC from 1969 – 1971. The two men were good friends, and their opening discussion about the banjo is a delight. But the best part is when Pete performs the folk classic “Worried Man Blues” and is soon joined by Johnny Cash at 5:14 – two legends together onstage, in an era before the evils of auto-tune, MTV, and bondage-themed music videos. In true Pete Seeger style, he gets the audience to join in. It’s a great moment in music and television and I hope it will uplift you as it did me :-)